“America ... has created a 'civilization' that represents an exact contradiction of the ancient European tradition. It has introduced the religion of praxis and productivity; it has put the quest for profit, great industrial production, and mechanical, visible, and quantitative achievements over any other interest. It has generated a soulless greatness of a purely technological and collective nature, lacking any background of transcendence, inner light, and true spirituality. America has [built a society where] man becomes a mere instrument of production and material productivity within a conformist social conglomerate” –Julius Evola
Baron Julius Evola, Italian aristocrat, esotericist, mountaineer,
Traditionalist and fascist ideologue, is one of the more interesting and
controversial Western mystics of the 20th century. Like Aleister Crowley and G.I. Gurdjieff, Evola was an
influential early example of a Westerner who looked Eastward for inner enrichment in
a cultural milieu that had been made barren for mystics by the West’s embrace
of rationalism, materialism and exoteric religiosity. Like Crowley and
Gurdjieff, Evola’s mystical dissent from the orthodoxies of modernity has made
him something of a cult figure, whose influence only seems to grow with time. Like
Crowley and Gurdjieff, Evola sought to actually become the kind of spiritual
superman prophesied by Nietzsche, rather than to merely philosophize about it,
via disciplines like Tantric Yoga, Hermeticism, mountaineering, esoteric Buddhism
and Taoism. Like Crowley and Gurdjieff, Evola is often considered a somewhat sinister
figure for his esoterically-enhanced Will to Power and rejection of Judeo-Christian moralism.
Such has long been the fate of mystics who walk the lonely road of mental
liberation and inner empowerment in the Western world!
However, thanks to the pioneering work of people like
Crowley, Gurdjieff and Evola, who paved the way for the massive influx of
esoteric and Eastern ideas into the West starting in the 1960’s, Eastern
mysticism and esoteric practices have gained a foothold in our culture that seems unstoppable. The spiritual hunger
that Evola felt, which led him to support fascism as a means of overthrowing
the mediocrity of spirit which is so epidemic in our civilization, is no longer
limited to a few eccentric men of privilege. Yoga is now mainstream, part of
the curriculum of every Young Men’s Christian Association chapter, and
self-improvement gurus promoting ideas based on Hinduism, Buddhism and
Taoism are frequent best-sellers. The ancient esoteric idea that each human being has within her
the potential for godhood was quite a radical and subversive idea not long ago,
but has become almost a cliché in our time. Since the New Age explosion, the
stranglehold of science and exoteric religion has been broken in the West,
probably forever. In fact, the West is well on its way to becoming the new
East, and vice versa!
Julius Evola’s life is fascinating because it reminds us
that esotericism is not, and should not be, a path to emasculated, feel-good, New Age
navel-gazing. On the contrary, Evola’s “Yoga of Power” is a path of
self-mastery which taps into the power of the shadow self, leading naturally to other-mastery when applied to the outer
universe, and which find its most natural political expression in hierarchy, esoteric theocracy and fascism – or what Evola called “Traditionalism.”
Traditionalism is a critique of the modern world more
radical than anything offered by Voltaire or Marx, for it is an ideology that
seeks nothing less than the overthrow the entire Enlightenment project and a return
to the divine orders of the Pharaonic God-Kings, Islamic Caliphs, Christian Holy
Roman Emperors, Hindu Brahmins and Tibetan Lamas. To a modern steeped in Enlightenment
values, Evola’s ideology seems shocking and misguided, but I would argue that in the longer view, history and human nature are on the Baron’s side. After all, the
Pharaohs reigned for 3000 years and the Brahmins and Roman Emperors are still with us after more
than 2000, while our post-Enlightenment democracies are less than a tenth as old and
already seem to be coming apart at the seams.
One of the first things all mystical paths must do is decondition
the mind, and when a Westerner does so, he will soon
discover, as Evola did, that he has been programmed with a whole array of ideas that have no deep basis in the human psyche – ideas which are really shallow
cerebrations to satisfy the rational mind, but which fail to inspire the
deeper levels of the unconscious mind which are the source of our greatest
power.

"You didn't demolish anything"
ReplyDeleteI beg to differ.
I'm questioning why you place so much value on your children's suffering, rather than looking at the suffering of life as a whole.
I have a whole blog, a book, and lots of commentaries on other websites about my thoughts on suffering. Don´t be so naive, I was just telling that, practically, to me, it ends with not having my children. If everyone did the same, that would be the goal, get it?
I guess you don´t, huh?
"If you believe all life is a mistake, fine"
I actually do. And my non-born children would be life as well, right? Like you are life. You are life at it´s most detestable point, right now. Just look at yourself in the mirror, would you?
"See your children just aren't that special"
My children was just an example of what antinatalism means to me, personally. Don´t be such a naive naive individual.
"and whether or not you have any won't change a fucking thing!"
It will to my non-born children right? Anyway... stupid little man, go watch some videos and read something about antinatalism. Might just as well start with my own blog.
Had enough?
I´ll tell you what. I´m getting tired of your ignorance, so, choose your words for the next post - the ones that will be framed here for more people to learn from your hardheadedness and from then on, all your posts will be sumarily deleted. I´m tired of wasting my time of reading good material to talk to such a inconsitent, hipocritical, and sad little individual.
Sorry man, but you´ve lost the argument the moment you said "Sith".